Feedback
Clear
You opened with the conclusion. The three reasons could be more distinct.
Four dimensions
Weights 35 / 30 / 20 / 15Key information
Missed “people don’t change habits easily”01:31
Structure
Conclusion in the first sentence00:02
Efficiency
2 repeats and a lead-in01:02
Fluency
One 4-second pause hurts clarity01:15
Separate the three reasons with “first, second, third”.
“First, timing. Second, distribution. Third, how strong the need is.”
Based on 01:02 Same point, three times
Evidence
Tap to hear your own words“Good products still fail, because timing, distribution and need all matter.”
You opened with the conclusion
“um, so this article is mainly about, um, why good products fail”
Restating the title — you can cut it
“timing is really important, timing is, like, really important, the timing”
Same point, three times
“distribution… (4-second pause) …people have to see it”
A 4-second pause — listeners lose the thread
“and then the need, it's about whether people need it or not”
Mentions need, but misses “people don’t switch just because it’s better”
Key points
Covered 2 / 3Timing: too early or too late both fail
Distribution: unseen means nonexistent
Need: if it isn’t urgent, people won’t switch
Model answer
ReferenceOne way to say it using “Three points”. Use your own words — don’t memorise it.
Good products still fail, because timing, distribution and need matter as much as quality. First, too early means educating a whole market, and too late means customers are taken. Second, if people never hear about it, it may as well not exist. Third, if the problem isn’t urgent, people live with it rather than switch.
Was this feedback helpful?
Rubric rubric-v1 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5 · confidence high